摘 要:本篇论文从什么是行政诉讼证明标准开始论述其中包含的有行政诉讼证明标准的特质,从四个主要方面入手:灵活性与延展性、中间性、复查性、特殊性,从而表现与民事诉讼证明标准、刑事诉讼证明标准的差别。我国的行政诉讼证明标准也存在这问题,比如证明标准过于单一,行政诉讼证明标准过于严格以及行政诉讼证明标准未反映行政诉讼特有的功能。英美法系国家行政诉讼证明标准与大陆法系国家行政诉讼证明标准的内容,在比较两者的利弊分析出对我国行政诉讼证明标准的启示。行政诉讼证明标准的研究对我国司法制度的完善有着显著的意义。文章主要分为四个部分:第一部分是行政诉讼证明标准的特质,考察行政诉讼证明标准的特征还有与民事诉讼、刑事诉讼证明标准的差异;第二部分是我国行政诉讼证明标准存在的问题;第三部分是外国行政诉讼证明标准的启示;第四部分是完善我国行政诉讼证明标准的思考。91905

毕业论文关键词:行政诉讼;证明标准;证据

STUDY ON CERTIFICATE STANDARD OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS

Abstract: This paper begins with the question of what is the standard of administrative litigation, which includes the characteristics of administrative litigation proof standard, from four main aspects: flexibility and extension, intermediate, review, particularity, and performance and civil action Proof of standards, differences in the standard of proof of criminal proceedings。 China's administrative litigation certification standards also exist this problem, such as the proof of the standard is too single, the administrative litigation proved that the standard is too strict and the administrative litigation certification standards do not reflect the administrative litigation-specific functions。 The standard of administrative litigation of civil law system and the content of national administrative litigation proof standard in civil law system, and analyzes the pros and cons of the two laws and the enlightenment to the standard of administrative litigation in our country。 The study of the standard of administrative litigation proves that there is significant significance to the improvement of our judicial system。 The article is pided into four parts: the first part is the characteristics of the standard of administrative litigation, and the characteristics of the administrative litigation proof standard are different from the standard of civil litigation and criminal litigation。 The second part is the problem of the standard of administrative litigation The third part is the inspiration of the standard of foreign administrative litigation; the fourth part is the reflection of the standard of proof of administrative litigation in our country。

Keywords:adminstrative litigation; criterion of proof; evidence

目  录

一、引言 1

二、行政诉讼证明标准源G于J优L尔V论N文M网WwW.youeRw.com 原文+QQ75201`8766 的特质 1

三、我国行政诉讼证明标准存在的问题

(一)行政诉讼证明标准单一 3

(二)行政诉讼证明标准过于严格 3

(三)行政诉讼证明标准未反映出行政诉讼特有的功能 3

四、外国行政诉讼证明标准的启示 4

(一)英美法系国家的行政诉讼证明标准 4

(二)大陆法系国家的行政诉讼证明标准 5

五、完善我国行政诉讼证明标准的思考

上一篇:以买卖合同担保民间借贷合同的法律性质及效力分析
下一篇:论间接正犯的认定及立法构建

行政诉讼证明标准研究

政府信息公开行政诉讼若干问题研究

浅论网络暴力行为的法律规制

论行政诉讼中规范性文件制定主体的法律地位

论行政诉讼变更判决制度

浅论我国大赦制度及其当代重构

浅论预期违约【3605字】

华夫饼国内外研究现状

透过家徽看日本文化家紋から見る日本文化

ASP.net+sqlserver会员管理系统设计

农村幼儿教育开题报告

论商业银行中间业务法律...

企业科研管理中统计报表...

高校体育场馆效益研究【2772字】

基于安卓平台的二维码会议管理系统设计

“时尚与旅游”电子杂志的设计制作

家电制造企业绿色供應链...