摘  要:检察院提起环境行政公益诉讼是填补环境行政公益诉讼原告资格立法空白的第一个突破口。检察院有资格提起环境行政公益诉讼有着其他主体无可比拟的优势,它的法律监督职能能够让诉讼更加公平公正地进行,多年的法庭经验也让其更具诉讼能力,而且检察院与被诉行政机关、法院之间的诉讼力量相平衡,能够保证诉讼的公平性。不可否认的是,对于检察院能够提起环境行政公益诉讼这点还是存在着诸多不足之处,一方面,检察院能够提起环境行政公益诉讼与它本身法律监督者的角色定位有冲突,它提起此类诉讼的专业程度也不够,而且它在人员配备、精力等方面也是有限的,可以说检察院并没有多少余力进行环境行政公益诉讼。另一方面,中西方检查体制的设置不同,一昧照搬外国经验并不可行。对此,可以通过明确检察院提起环境行政公益诉讼时的角色定位、举证责任的分配、诉讼费用的承担,招录专业人员、配置专业化设备以及无需承担败诉时不利的法律后果解决这些不足,一定程度上也完善了我国环境行政公益诉讼制度。71558

毕业论文关键词:环境行政公益诉讼;检察院;环境公共利益

Analysis on Advantages and Disadvantages of Procuratorate Initiate Administrative Environmental Public Interest Litigation

Abstract:Procuratorate initiates administrative environmental public interest litigation is the first breakthrough of filling the blank of the environmental administrative public interest litigation plaintiff qualification of legislation .Procuratorate has the qualification to bring environmental administrative public interest litigation is an incomparable advantage of other subjects.Its legal supervision function can make the litigation more fair and impartial, many years of experience in the court also made it more litigation.And the people's procuratorate, the administrative organ of the defendant, the court can maintain a relative balance ,to ensure the fairness of litigation.There is no denying that,the procuratorate can bring environmental administrative public interest litigation  still has many shortcomings.On the one hand,it has a conflict that procuratorate can initiate administrative environmental public interest litigation and its  role of the legal supervisor.It is not professional enough to bring such a lawsuit,and it is also limited in staffing, energy and other aspects.It can say that the procuratorate do not have much spare capacity for environmental administrative public interest litigation.On the other hand, Chinese and Western censorships are different, blindly copy foreign experience is not feasible.This,Procuratorate can definitely initiate administrative environmental public interest litigation role, allocation of the burden of proof, bear the cost of litigation, recruiting professionals, professional equipment configuration, and do not need to bear the legal consequences of adverse effects to solve these deficiencies.To a certain extent, the environmental administrative public interest litigation system in our country has been also perfected.

Key Words:Environmental administrative public interest litigation,Procuratorate,Environmental public interest

目  录

一、引言1

二、环境行政公益诉讼制度确立的必要性1

(一)社会现实的需要——保护环境公共利益1

(二)司法实践的需要——填补我国环境公益行政诉讼的立法空白2

三、检察院提起环境行政公益诉讼制度的确立及其意义2

(一)弥补了相关立法的缺位2

(二)弥补了私权起诉的不足3

(三)强有力地促进了行政机关依法行政3

四、检察院提起环境行政公益诉讼的优势3

(一)检察院的法律监督职能能保证诉讼更加公平公正地进行3

上一篇:论强制安装软件行为的法律属性及其规制
下一篇:我国商业银行市场退出机制法律构建与完善

网络环境下著作权的合理...

论风险预防原则在环境法中的运用及完善

我国环境侵权损害赔偿制...

论我国环境保护公众参与法律制度的完善

高薪是否养廉基于中国反腐的制度环境

网络环境下消费者撤回权研究

网络环境下隐私权的民法保护【3952字】

浅谈高校行政管理人员的...

STC89C52单片机NRF24L01的无线病房呼叫系统设计

上海居民的社会参与研究

浅论职工思想政治工作茬...

压疮高危人群的标准化中...

从政策角度谈黑龙江對俄...

基于Joomla平台的计算机学院网站设计与开发

酵母菌发酵生产天然香料...

提高教育质量,构建大學生...

AES算法GPU协处理下分组加...