6

3。2 Corpus Collection 6

4 Corpus Analysis 6

4。1 Identity Types 6

4。1。1 Expert Identity and the Related Constructive Strategies 7

4。1。1。1 Knowledgeable Expert 7

4。1。1。2 Authoritative Expert 7

4。1。1。3 Modest and Mild Expert 8

4。1。2 Teacher Identity and the Related Constructive Strategies 9

4。1。3 Peer Researcher Identity and the Related Constructive Strategies 10

4。1。4 Layperson Identity and the Related Constructive Strategies 10

4。2 Identity Distribution 11

5 Motivations for Expert Identity Construction 13

Conclusion 14

Acknowledgements 15

References 16

Appendix A 18

Appendix B 19

1 Introduction

1。1 Research Background

Recent years have witnessed the rising attention to identity research, ranging from theoretical research to applied research (Antaki, & Widdieombe, 1998; Tracy, 2002; Tina, 2007)。 Identity also falls into the domain of Pragmatics research (Chen, 2013a, 2013b, 2014, 2016; Ren, 2016; Guo, 2016; Li, 2016)。 Pragmatic Identity studies how these dynamically constructed identities in context are employed to convey meaning and realize communicators’ illocutionary or/and relational purpose。 

In this new millennium, with the advancement of higher education, college students and researchers encounter more opportunities for academic communication。 Therefore, it is of necessity to study their linguistic and strategic repertoires in academic interactions and more importantly to reveal what identities they construct in this process。 This thesis aims at studying advice-givers’ identity construction in an academic verbal interaction and exploring identity types, construction strategies and pragmatic motivations。 Hopefully it can make some contributions to pragmatic identity research。

1。2 Research Object

In academic verbal interaction, interlocutors choose different utterances to construct different personal identities (Tina, 2007), including expected identity and unexpected identity。 The following is an example:

     1 T1: 但是就是思辨本身它是有载体。什么叫载体,就是说你思辨是有基础的,就是在,我记得我在哪一个国外学者介绍一个思辨,它是有一个金字塔式的

     2 S:  嗯。

     3 T1: 在最下面是思辨=

     4 S:  =那个是,那个是

     5 T1: 也就是说你待在思辨位置的时候发生思辨,所以我认为它就质的,含有质变的一个,知识的等等的积累。=

     6 S:  =嗯,对。老师您说的,

During the institutional conversation (Thornborrow, 2002, P。4), T1 is expected to be an expert with deep wisdom and extensive knowledge。 In the first line, T1 clarifies the relationships between critical thinking and carrier。 Meanwhile, T1 is also regarded as a teacher as S confirms T1’s teacher identity in the sixth line by directly calling T1 as teacher。

上一篇:乞丐文化在中西方新闻报道语言差异中的体现
下一篇:弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫《到灯塔去》原型理论观照

探究初中英语课堂中的互动教学

小学英语课堂中生生互动存在的问题及策略

互动模式在初中英语课堂中应用研究

初中英语口语教学中跨文化交际能力的培养

多模态理论在小学英语口语教学中的应用

初中生英语口语母语负迁移现象研究

英语趣配音在农村小学英语口语教学中的应用

浅谈芭蕾舞外开与中国古典舞外旋的区别

社会工作视野下医患关系的冲突与协调

18岁可以學什么技术,18岁...

原位离子交换法合成AgBrAg3PO4复合光催化材料

结肠透析机治疗慢性肾功...

中学地理生活化教学研究

论好莱坞电影中的中国文化元素

稀土伴生放射性冶炼厂环境放射性水平调查

沉箱码头设计国内外研究现状和参考文献

谈人机工程学在公共电话亭设计中的应用