treating  their  employees  as ends  in themselves  and  not merely  as a means?
When Carroll  says that  the essence of these philanthropic  activities is  that
they are "not generally expected  of business in an ethical sense'  (1993: 33,
emphasis added)  this raises the question of  exactly when an activity can be
considered  ethical as opposed  to philanthropic  according  to Carrolls treatment
of these two domains.  For example,  is a corporation's  contribution  to a chari-
table  organization  an  ethical  activity  (i.e*,  expected  by society)  or  a philanthropic
activity (i.e., merely desired  by society)? Evidence  currently  indicates  that  the
majority  of companies  donate  to charitable  organizations  (Carroll  1993: 387),
with a majority  of  the population  expecting that companies make charitable
donations  (Sexty  1995: 274). Do  these findings not suggest that society now
expects  corporate  philanthropic  contributions?  According  to Carroll's  defini-
tions, the paramount  example of a philanthropic  activity, giving to charitable
organizations,  could arguably  fall under  the ethical  domain,  rather  than  needing
to be separated  into a philanthropic  domain  as currently  defined.
Even  if one  is able  to make  a theoretical  distinction  between  ethical  and  phil-
anthropic  activities,  there  is still an  issue as  to whether  such  a distinction  could  be
applied  by empirical  researchers  in the field. Clarkson  (1995: 95)  for example,
raises  concerns  over  the ability  to define and measure  discretionary  activities  in
the actual  corpoxate  world.  Aupperle,  Carroll,  and  Hatfield  (1985:  455) state  that
Carroll's  philanthropic  domain  is '4difficult  to ascertain  and  evaluate."  Strong  and
Meyer  conclude  in their  study  that  while there  was strong  support  for  the exist-
ence  of  the  economic,  legalS and ethical  components of  corporate social responsibility,  it may  be appropriate  for  the  philanthropic  category  to be removed
from  Carroll's  framework  when  attempting  to measure  managerial  perceptions  of
responsibility.  They  state:  "The  results  for  discretionary  (philanthropic)  responsi-
bility  do  not  support  the  survey's  use  as  a  general  measure  of managerial  perception
of responsibility  of this  component  of social responsibility"  (1992: 92, emphasis
added).  Although  many  researchers  have  found  support  for a philanthropic  com-
ponent,  the concerns  raised  by other  researchers  suggest  that  its use as a distinct
component  of CSR might  be re-examined.
In addition  to ethical reasons, corporate  philanthropy  might also be based
primarily  on economic motives  (Shaw and  Post 1993: 748), often  referred  to as
"strategic  giving"  or "strategic  philanthropy"  (Yankee  1996:  9-10). Whether  to
上一篇:带式输送机技术英文文献和中文翻译
下一篇:大型高压泵列车英文文献和翻译

移动码头的泊位分配问题英文文献和中文翻译

纤维素增强的淀粉-明胶聚...

多极化港口系统的竞争力外文文献和中文翻译

阻尼减震平台的设计英文文献和中文翻译

超精密自由抛光的混合机...

旋转式伺服电机的柔性电...

过程约束优化数控机床的...

提高教育质量,构建大學生...

基于Joomla平台的计算机学院网站设计与开发

压疮高危人群的标准化中...

酵母菌发酵生产天然香料...

浅论职工思想政治工作茬...

AES算法GPU协处理下分组加...

上海居民的社会参与研究

浅谈高校行政管理人员的...

STC89C52单片机NRF24L01的无线病房呼叫系统设计

从政策角度谈黑龙江對俄...