O’Malley & Chamot (1985) generated their classifications about language learning strategies from three board categories—metacognitive, cognitive, and social mediating strategies。 The last one later becomes social/affective categories in their study in 1900。 O’Malley & Chamot (1900) regarded metacognitive learning strategy as “high order executive skills” (Brown, et al。, 1983, cited in P44) consisting of considering learning process, planning, monitoring learning, or self-evaluation after finishing tasks。 As for cognitive learning strategy, it “operates directly on incoming information, manipulating it in way that enhance learning” (P44), mainly including repetition, summarization, organization, inference, elaboration, and deduction。 And social/affective learning strategy is a way of using social interactions or mental control about affection to promote understanding, acquiring or retention of information, prominently including cooperation and self-talking。 Admittedly, they depicted learning strategies in a very detailed way such as cognitive and metacognitive function, while, the existing drawback is that little attention paid to the social/affective part。

上一篇:《哈克贝利·费恩历险记》中哈克的成长之路
下一篇:《父亲的眼泪》中的异托邦空间

中国特色政治话语英译策...

德语论文格罗皮乌斯设计理念的改变和发展

中国学习者对英语/n//l//r/的感知和产出研究

《红楼梦》和《简爱》中...

FNT视角下的跨文化商务传播及其策略研究

理性与非理性简爱和伯莎梅森反抗的对比分析

元认知策略在高中英语阅读教学中的应用

谈人机工程学在公共电话亭设计中的应用

原位离子交换法合成AgBrAg3PO4复合光催化材料

中学地理生活化教学研究

论好莱坞电影中的中国文化元素

稀土伴生放射性冶炼厂环境放射性水平调查

结肠透析机治疗慢性肾功...

18岁可以學什么技术,18岁...

社会工作视野下医患关系的冲突与协调

沉箱码头设计国内外研究现状和参考文献

浅谈芭蕾舞外开与中国古典舞外旋的区别