Brown & Levinson (1987) put forward Politeness Theory based on Goffman’s theory of face。 They propose the theory that politeness strategies are chosen according to the degree of face threats。

Brown & Levinson summarize the politeness strategies as the following:

Do the FTA: (1) on record; without regressive action, badly; with regressive action positive politeness negative politeness (2) off record。 Don’t do the FTA。 (Brown & Levinson,1987; 60)

According to Brown & Levinson’s opinion, in business communication the Hearer and the Speaker want to build and maintain a friendly and comfortable business atmosphere, and the Speaker will try his best to satisfy the Hearer’s interest, wants, and needs, or on the other hand the Hearer wants the Speaker’s notice and approval (Brown & Levinson, 1987 :103)。

Brown & Levinson believe that “face is the public self-image that every member wants to claim for himself。” “Face is something that is emotionally invested, and that can be lost, maintained, or enriched, and must be constantly attended to in interaction”(Brown & Levinson, 1987:61)。 They believe that people save face in mutual cooperation 。文献综述

Brown & Levinson also make a distinction between positive and negative face and believe they are interrelated。 Positive face refers to an inpidual’s desire for approval, which means one hopes to get other people’s approval, love, appreciation and respect; negative face refers to an inpidual’s desire for autonomy, which means one does not want to be interrupted by other people but has his own freedom of choice (Brown & Levinson, 1987 : 62)。 In order to achieve face, people tend to apply appropriate strategic actions。 This politeness strategy includes bold on record, positive politeness, negative politeness, off record, non-performance。

Brown & Levinson also propose Face Threatening Acts which pose a threat to the self-image of the other party in the process of communication。 Face threatening acts can be found both in positive and negative face。 Speech acts posing a threat to a listener’s positive face mean that speaker pays little attention to the listener’s feelings, needs, and interest, which include objection, criticism, scorn, ridicule, complaint, insult and etc。 Speech acts which pose a threat to a listener’s negative face mean that speaker asks listener to do something and makes him feel under pressure。 These kinds of speech acts include order, request, suggestion, remind, threatening, warning and etc。

 Brown & Levinson believe that their face and politeness theory is a universal theory which applies to any culture。 Yet this needs to be proven。 In cross-cultural business communication, it can not be denied that confrontation and cooperation both exist side by side。 Brown & Levinson’s theory can be used to explain which speech acts threaten face, to which extent and what strategies should be taken as response。

上一篇:论动物隐喻在中西文化中的差异
下一篇:论《一个人的朝圣》有关爱的失去与回归

目的论视角下江苏省两所...

多元互补论视角下的《三字经》英译研究

民族主义视野下的重译研...

功能对等理论下魔幻小说...

顺应论视角下《京华烟云》的无根回译

社会符号学视角下的法律术语翻译研究

从佩雷尔曼论辩修辞学视...

煤油凝胶推进剂国内外研究现状

新常态下國企混改与投资...

基于VB的煤调湿监控系统设计+源程序

asp.net+sqlserver课程教学网站的设计+源代码

扬州虹桥坊仿古休闲街区的旅游开发

万达房地产营销策略研究

农民市民化過程中农民良...

新材料产业发展状况评析...

勘察设计企业應收账款的管理【3224字】

微孔化对镍基自润滑镀层摩擦学性能的影响